Hollywood actress Lindsay Lohan has told a U.S. magazine she is "bisexual".

The Mean Girls star has been romantically linked to British DJ Samantha Ronson since they were spotted kissing and cuddling at a party in Cannes, France earlier this year (2008).

The 22-year-old had been continually refusing to comment on her relationship. She has also been dodged questions about her sexuality.

But in an interview with Harper’s Bazaar magazine, Lohan is asked whether she is bisexual and answers, "Maybe. Yeah."

For a role as a nympohmaniac waitress, in the new movie Florence, Lindsay Lohan has offered to strip naked. Yes, full frontal, firecrotch on display, Lindsay Lohan naked. But get this, the script only calls for a Lindsay Lohan topless scene, leading the producers to turn down her offer. WHAAAT! Don’t worry, though. While we may not get to see Lindsay Lohan nude, full frontal (this time, anyway), we’ll still get to see Lindsay Lohan topless, reports Softpedia. And how much does a fully naked Lindsay Lohan go for these days? Well after she got paid nothing to pose nude for New York magazine, she’s only getting a paltry $75,000 for this new role.

Lindsay Lohan sure needs very little persuasion to get naked these days, for… artistic purposes, that is. The rehabbed actress - who, incidentally, has been spotted downing rather a lot of vodka and popping pills in various clubs lately - made a passion for removing her clothes in full view of the world, and is quite keen to keep at it. After her brief nude stint in New York magazine (where she did her best to re-enact Marilyn Monroe’s famous last sitting with photographer Bert Stern), Lohan set her sights on a role which would reportedly allow her to give full reign to her underlying nudity and play a nymphomaniac waitress in the indie film "Florence". Although the role only requires Lindsay to take her top off for one sex scene, the actress allegedly volunteered to do a lot more.

In exchange for her flesh-baring efforts, Lohan is only getting paid $75,000. However, this is of no importance to her, as she’s just keen to… well, get naked and sweaty. That is, get down to business. "Lindsay doesn’t care that she’s getting paid peanuts," reports an insider quoted by Star magazine. "She just wants to remind people that she can act and she’s worth hiring." Also, the source reports that although the script only requires LiLo to show her boobs, she offered to go all the way down and strip completely. "She said it would be no problem to go Full Monty," added the insider. Thankfully, the producers refused to go along with her very helpful offer.

Now, let me get this straight. Lindsay Lohan is willing to get naked on camera for just $75,000? Okay, someone get me a video camera and $75,000. It’s time to make a movie.

Also, if Lindsay Lohan is trying to prove her skills as an actress, wouldn’t make more sense to try and play against type? I mean, a nymphomaniac waitress? Is that really any different than already being a nymphomaniac actress?

Lindsay Lohan is planning to star in a another movie about murderers and this time it’s a new film about Charles Manson! Specifically, People Magazine reports:

Lindsay Lohan, fresh off her big-screen role opposite John Lennon’s killer (aka the chubby Jared Leto) in Chapter 27, has signed up to star in another film about a murderer – this time, it’s Charles Manson.

Lohan, 21, will play one of Manson’s cult followers, Nancy Pitman, in the movie Manson Girls, E! Online reports. The site quotes the film’s producer, Brad Wyman, as saying, "Yes, I am doing it with Lindsay."

Honestly, what is Lindsay’s obsession with murderer movies. It seems like whenever she wants to make a new movie lately, she goes out of her way to find one about murderers! I don’t know what it is, maybe it’s based on frustration because she hasn’t had one of her "world famous" vodka-vicodin cocktails in a while. And, let me tell you, Lindsay shakes up a mean vodka-vicodin cocktail! I’ve had one, they’re delicious!

Anyway, let’s hope, for Lindsay’s sake, that this movie actually turns out to be good… because other than Mean Girls, which, as far as I’m concerned is so good that it’s basically a mostion-picture version of The Bible, she really hasn’t done any good movie work lately. So, please, Lindsay, work extra-hard this time to make this movie work! Go ahead, baby, make daddy proud!